 |
Photo Competition
As was threatened at the
time, the rules will change on the whim of the
organisers. Whilst the old are still valid (see end of
page), the Scoring Committee have introduced a new
measure.
We want photos of a teacakes in unusual, special or generally interesting places.
If there's a story with it, all the better. We want
teacake photos with a spirit of adventure!
The prize? A selection of Tunnock's produce from my
cupboard. Or something. Email your entries to bob [at] teamteacake.com With thanks to award-winning product design engineer Craig M Smith MEng FRSA, whose idea this whole shindig was.
He should, like, totally enter. |
|
| |
 |
Leaderboard
|
Position |
Points |
Name |
|
1 |
22 |
Mr James
Cunningham |
|
2 |
17 |
Ms Lesley Atkins &
Mr Graham Wharmby |
|
3 |
10 |
Mr Gareth
Walker |
|
4 |
10 |
Messrs
Pack & Baird, Miss G Frier |
|
5 |
7 |
Mr J David
Toy |
|
6 |
5 |
Mr Angus
Duncan |
|
7 |
4 |
Miss A
Davies |
|
8 |
3.5 |
Mr J David
Toy |
Entrant: Mr J
David Toy (London Bureau)
Title: "Teacake
at Primrose Hill, London, Englandshire"

The
judges debated this entry at length.
It
features a capital city without doubt, and so
scores 2pts. More controversial was its claim
to be the site of a famous movie scene;
Bridget Jones' Diary. The issue lay with whether
said film could be considered famous. It was decided
to give the benefit of the doubt, but in recognition
of the perceived crapness of the film (neither judge
having seen it, but having entrenched
preconceptions), only 1 point should be
awarded. The second point of contention was the
claim to be 'at high altitude'. On the basis
that the title included the word 'hill' but that
those bystanders in shot had no need of breathing
apparatus, ice axes or sherpas, 0.5 of a point
was awarded.
Total
score: 3.5 points
Entrant: Miss
A Davies
Title: "Caramel
Log at the Canadian Parliament, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada"

Again,
cause for controversy with this entry.
After
lengthy discussion the entry was allowed on the
basis that a reasonable attempt had been made to
obtain a genuine Teacake, having searched two Tesco
stores and all of Glasgow Airport. In this case, a
caramel log was accepted as a substitute, especially
given it's unusual bilingual wrapper. A
discretionary 1 point has been awarded here
for ingenuity, and partially to compensate
for the "extraordinary expense" incurred in
obtaining such a specimen.
The
photo
features a capital city and so
scores 2pts. Being a parliamentary building,
it also qualifies as a terrorist target.
However, given that the Canadians have never
offended anyone and that a bomb at that distance
would barely damage the bathroom window, only 1
point is awarded.
Total
score: 4 points
Entrant: Mr
Angus Duncan
Title: "A
Teacake over the Edge of the Forth Road Bridge in
High-ish Winds (Enough to Cause a Speed Restriction)"

This
entry has been assessed against 4 criteria.
(1)
Danger to photographers life: high-ish winds are
the artist's claim here. The Committee have ruled
that danger would be recognised only at the stage of
banning high-sided vehicles, and not merely a
speed restriction, hence 0 points are
awarded.
(2)
At high altitude: frankly the absolute altitude
is unimpressive, but the judges are prepared to
award a discretionary 1 point on the basis
that it would ****ing hurt if you fell from there.
(3)
Capital city: the defendant claims that in being
"near the Edinburgh side", the photo qualifies for 2
points. However, inspection by trusted and well
regarded independent authority Google Maps has
resulted in the Forth Road Bridge being classified
as outside Edinburgh, falling outwith the
A720 ring-road. Tough luck - 0 points.
(4)
Terrorist Target: "I consider the bridge a
"Terrorist Target", because of the huge volume of
traffic which crosses it and the knock - on effects
if it was damaged." The judges recognise the
artist's fears here; demolition of the bridge by
highly dangerous SNP activists would cause chaos on
the A8000, certain to lead to the death of millions
of commuters as they starve in their immobile cars.
4 points!
Total
score: 5 points
Entrant:
Mr J
David Toy
Title: "Teacake
at Sea"

Mr Toy returns with a
fine entry! Apparently Bristol lies over that
horizon - he has even helpfully provided a
map of its location. 3 points, coz that's
cool.
"Unfortunately,
shortly after this photo was taken, this particular
teacake was swept over the side by a large wave.
Perhaps Neptune, god of the seas, is also a fan."
In recognition of
this sad loss, The Commission have awarded a
consolation point for having lost a dear
teacake at sea.
"Before the
teacake was taken by the gods it had been subjected
to a 730 mile journey by sea with the usual perils
of a force 8 gale, confused seas, stealth attacks by
supertankers and dangerous approaches by ravenous
members of the crew."
That sounds fairly
adventurous, but had the photo been taken with the
force 8 gale and/or supertanker, we'd have been more
impressed. And talking of supertankers, if one of
these can sneak up on you then you need to
wake the hell up! Hmm... 3 points for
surviving your own incompetence.
Total
score: 7 points
Entrant: Mr
Gareth Walker
Title: "Summit
of Mont Ventoux"

"Another entry for your photo competition. I am
claiming the following:
1) Its a capital hill and capital of Provence!
2) Summit of Mont Ventoux an obvious terrorist
target with its huge
antennae and clear visibility!
3) Has to be a wonder of the world! ( or me at 43
fat, hungover
cycling to the summit)!
4) Tom Simpson as a celebrity
5) High altitude, just under 2000m!
6) Danger to photographers life. 2000m in March with
le mistral
blowing wind chill minus a lot, frost bite to hands
and to feet with
standing in snow and a 36km down hill ride back to a
tent!
7) Also claiming extra points for overtaking 5
cyclists on the way up
and 3 French who gave up a km from the summit due to
le mistral and
tried to wave me down to stop, shouting 'il est
dangereux!'. I just waved
as I went for broke to the summit."
Legal Update: The Test Case Committee found in
favour of Mr Walker, ruling it may be considered
precedent that a Team Teacake jersey constitutes a
Teacake for the purposes of this competition. In
regard of the claims set out above:
1) I
can't see the Eiffel Tower... null points.
2 & 3)
These claims are clearly the result of oxygen
deprivation, and so were dismissed by The Panel.
4) Tom
Simpson is indeed a celebrity. A dead celebrity,
but a celebrity nonetheless. In fact, he scores
bonus points for having never appeared on 'Celebrity
Big Brother' or endorsed a low-fat grilling product.
5 points!
5) The
Judges agree that 2000m is indeed high altitude,
as confirmed by the snow. Having attained
said altitude entirely under his own steam
again warrants a bonus point: 4 points.
6) Man
up. Looks like the sun's out to me!
7)
You've done the jersey proud, son. Bonus point.
Total
score: 10 points
Entrant:
Mr Simon Pack, Mr Colin Baird & Miss Gemma Frier
Title: "Teacakes
at the Henri Desgrange Memorial"

This
photo bears a striking resemblance to an earlier
entry by Mr Walker, and so will clearly score
negative 1 point for originality! However, Mr
Pack & Chums have bettered our Alpine pioneer by
some 700m vertical at 2645m - no mean feat!
5 points.
The
claim to be the site of a famous movie scene
- "I've lots of Tour de France DVDs for you to
check!" - is questionable, as is claiming the
Tour de France to be a sporting wonder of the
modern world (the panel are still awaiting a
badly photoshopped Colossus of Rhodes entry,
incidentally). Null points.
Again
similar to Mr Walker, the memorial to a dead
celebrity. "FOUNDER of the TDF, Henri
Degrange - He invented the WHOLE IDEA", Mr Pack
enthusiastically informs us. The Panel were willing
to match Mr Walker's score of 5 points, but
warn the precedent may not continue as living
celebrities are just a bit more interesting.
Finally, the presence of 3 teacake (jerseys)
in the photo (and 2 behind the camera) scores one
last point.
Be
warned though! The 'teacake jersey = teacake'
ruling may face future legal challenge if it
is suspected that entrants are taking advantage of
the jerseys' superior durability to avoid
transporting teacakes on adventures.
Total
score: 10 points
Entrant(s):
Ms
Lesley Atkins & Mr Graham Wharmby
Title: "Teacake
Microlighting"

At
last, a worthy contender!
The
judges were immediately taken with the obvious
altitude, scoring 3 points right off.
Danger to the photographer's life was also
apparent, as flying no-handed is never
recommended... 3 points. Even scoring 1
point for the beautiful evening light,
the entry is off to a great start.
However, it was the intimate knowledge of Teacake
manufacture that impressed most. Who else knew that
the light and fluffy mallow in Teacakes was actually
particularly dense cloud? The entrants are clearly
flying through the clouds to harvest fresh
Teacakes as they are born. Plucking them from
the sky as they fall slowly to earth, this
inventive pair have demonstrated excellent piloting
skills and hand-eye coordination: 10 points.
Total
score: 17 points
Entrant:
Mr James Cunningham
Title: "Teacake
at the Summit of Mont Blanc"

Wow.
The scoring committee liked this one.
Although this is the second entrant from atop a
French Alp, at 4808m this one is 2.5 times the
height of Ventoux. Having reached the highest
point in Western Europe under his own steam, we
are pleased to award no fewer that 10 points for
altitude.
It
looks pretty damn cold up there, we can't
see much oxygen and Mr Cunningham still has to
get down, and so another 10 points are
awarded for danger to the claimant's life.
"The pictured teacake, despite being lovingly
protected and carried all the way to the summit, was
consumed in one large mouthful not long after the
photo was taken. It tasted good."
Finally, recognition is certainly due for managing
to take accomplish this feat with the Teacake
surviving intact: 2 points, and we hope
you enjoyed it.
Total
score: 22 points
Ze
Old Rules
- Capital city [2pts]
- Site of a famous movie scene [3pts]
- Terrorist target [4pts]
- In a warzone [5pts]
- Wonder of the World [10pts]
- With a celebrity [4pts, dependent upon quality of celebrity as judged by the Panel]
- Being eaten by a celebrity [6pts, again dependent upon quality of celebrity. "Big Brother" contestants are not celebrities.]
- At high altitude [3pts]
- At particularly low altitude [3 pts]
- At high speed [2pts]
- Low earth orbit [8pts]
- Geostationary orbit and above [12pts]
Bonus points awarded at the discretion of the Panel according to the following criteria:
- Imagination
- Danger to photographer's life
- Technical and aesthetic quality of photo
|